Business Startups, insolvency, bankruptcy, liquidations and Tax advice in Birmingham: Heathcote & Coleman, Birmingham
Business Startups Birmingham Accountants Birmingham Payroll Services in Birmingham Corporate Finance Birmingham Grants Birmingham Bankruptcy Birmingham Tax Advice Birmingham
 
Audit & Assurance
Business Development
Management Information
Grant Finance
Inward Investment Services
Outsourcing
News & Events
Business Accountants: News and Events
Individual Voluntary Arrangement Birmingham
Corporate Finance Birmingham Business Prophets
 
  NEWS >> Current Spring Bulletins - 2006
 
Employers' compliance update
Modernising Company Law
 
 
 
     
       
 

Employers' compliance update

Introduction

In April 2003, Gordon Brown announced changes to the Construction Industry Scheme (CIS). The changes were originally due to take effect in April 2005 but were deferred initially to April 2006 and, at the eleventh hour, to April 2007. The last minute deferral, whilst welcome, is merely a reprieve and there is no doubt that the Revenue will continue in the meantime to clamp down on what they see as widespread abuse within the industry.

Under the new scheme the Revenue will be placing great emphasis on automatic penalties for late returns, failure to provide records or payslips etc but also a monthly emphasis on the employed/self-employed position of the subcontractors. If contractors get this wrong, once again penalties may apply.

This bulletin focuses on the main areas requiring consideration over the coming months. There are some fundamental issues which need to be considered prior to April 2007..

« back to top


No vouchers

Under the new CIS, from April 2007 all of the old vouchers such as the CIS23, CIS24 and CIS25 will become redundant. In addition, the annual CIS return will also be scrapped. This at first appears to be an advantage of the new scheme.

However, the current requirements will be replaced by a monthly return. Contractors will have to make a monthly return to the Revenue:

  • confirming that the employment status of subcontractors has been considered
  • confirming that the new verification process has been correctly dealt with
  • detailing payments made to all subcontractors and
  • detailing any deductions of tax made from those payments.

The monthly return can be sent either manually or electronically and will relate to each tax month (ie running from the 6th of one month to the 5th of the next). The deadline for submission is 14 days after the end of the tax month. Even if no subcontractors have been paid during a month, contractors will still have to make a nil return. All contractors will be obliged to file monthly even if they are entitled to pay their PAYE quarterly.

« back to top


No CIS cards

From April 2007 there will be no registration cards or tax certificates. Instead subcontractors must give contractors their name, unique taxpayer reference and national insurance number (or company registration number) when they enter into a contract. So long as the contractor is satisfied that the subcontractor is genuinely self-employed the verification procedure (click for explanation) must be followed.

« back to top


Employed or self-employed?

A key part of the new regime will be that the contractor has to make a monthly declaration that they have considered the status of the subcontractors and are satisfied that none of those listed on the return are employees. The Revenue have decided to back this up with a penalty of up to £3,000 if contractors negligently or deliberately provide incorrect information.

Remember that employment status is not a matter of choice. The circumstances of the engagement determine how it is treated.

The issue of the status of workers within the construction industry is not a new matter and over the last 18 months the Revenue have been making substantial efforts to re-classify as many subcontractors as possible as employees. The courts have considered many cases over the years and take into account a variety of different factors in deciding whether or not a worker is employed or self-employed. The tests which are applied include:

  • the right of control over how, what, where and when the work is done; the more control that a contractor can exercise, the more likely it is that the worker is an employee
  • whether the worker provides a personal service or whether a substitute could be provided to do that work
  • whether any equipment is necessary to do the job, and if so, who provides it
  • the basis of payment - whether an hourly/weekly rate is paid, whether there is any overtime, sick or holiday pay and whether or not invoices are raised for the work done
  • whether the worker is part and parcel of the organisation or whether they are conducting a task which is self-contained in its own right
  • what the intention of the parties is - whether there is any written statement that there is no intention of an employment relationship
  • whether there is a mutuality of obligation; that is, an ongoing understanding that the contractor will offer work and the worker accept it
  • whether the workers have any financial risk.

As can be seen from the above, there are a number of factors which must be considered and the decision as to whether somebody should be classified as employed or self-employed is not a simple one.

Clearly, the Revenue would like subcontractors to be classed as employees, as this generally means that more tax and national insurance is due. However, just because the Revenue think that somebody should be re-classified does not necessarily mean that they are correct.

It is interesting that the Revenue are developing software to address this matter but the software appears to be heavily weighted towards re-classifying subcontractors as employees. It should not be relied on and professional advice should be taken if this is a major issue for your business. Please talk to us as a matter of urgency if you have any particular concerns in this area.

« back to top


Verification

The contractor will have to contact the Revenue to check whether to pay a subcontractor gross or net. Not every subcontractor will need verifying. Usually it will only be new ones.

The verification procedure will establish which of the following payment options apply:

  • gross payment
  • a standard rate deduction of 18%, which is the current rate of deduction
  • a deduction made at the higher rate (yet to be announced but possibly around 30%) if the subcontractor has not registered with the Revenue or cannot provide accurate details to the contractor and the Revenue cannot verify them.

The Revenue will give the contractor a verification number for the subcontractors which will be matched with the Revenue’s own computer. The number will be the same for each subcontractor verified at any particular time. There will be special numbers for subcontractors who cannot be verified. The numbers will have to appear on contractors’ monthly returns and payslips.

Clearly, these numbers are a fundamental part of the new system and contractors will have to ensure that they have a fool-proof system in place for obtaining and retaining them. It will also be very important to give precise details to the Revenue because, if their computer does not recognise the subcontractor, the higher rate deduction will have to be made.

« back to top


A payslip?

Contractors will have to provide a monthly ‘payslip’ to all subcontractors paid, showing the total amount of the payments and how much tax, if any, has been deducted from those payments. The contractor will have to provide this for each tax month as a minimum. Contractors will be allowed to choose the style of the ‘payslips’ themselves but certain specific information will have to be provided including:

  • the contractor’s name
  • the contractor’s employers’ tax reference
  • the tax month to which the payment relates
  • the subcontractor’s name, unique tax reference or specific subcontractor reference
  • the gross amount of the payment
  • the cost of any materials which have reduced the gross payment and
  • the amount of any deductions.

It may well be that contractors want to include such payments as part of their normal payroll system. However, if this option is chosen, it will need to be clear that although payslips are being generated for those individuals, they are not employees and have clearly been classed as self-employed.

« back to top


Penalties

The whole system is backed up by a series of penalties. These cover situations in which an incorrect monthly return is sent in negligently or fraudulently, failure to provide CIS records for the Revenue to inspect and incorrect declarations about employment status. However, two further penalties will be much more common on a day to day basis:

  • for failure to send in the monthly return there will be a penalty of £100 per 50 subcontractors (or part thereof) per month
  • for failure to provide a subcontractor with a ‘payslip’, a penalty of up to £300, plus a further penalty of up to £60 per day for continuing failure.

Clearly procedures and controls will be vital in avoiding these penalties.

« back to top


Paying over the deductions

Contractors will have to pay over all deductions made from subcontractors in any given tax month by the 19th following the end of the tax month to which the deductions relate. If payment is being made electronically, the date will be the 22nd, or the next earlier banking day when the 22nd is a weekend or holiday. If the contractor is a company which itself has deductions made from its payments as a subcontractor, then the deductions made may be set against the company’s liabilities for PAYE, NI and any CIS deductions it is due to pay over.

« back to top


What about subcontractors?

There will be transitional rules for subcontractors currently within CIS. A subcontractor under the existing CIS may not need to register under the new CIS if they have:

  • a tax certificate (CIS5 or 6)
  • a permanent registration card (CIS4(P))
  • a temporary registration card (CIS4(T)) that has not expired.

However, if a subcontractor first starts working in the construction industry on a self-employed basis after 5 April 2007, or had a temporary registration card that has expired, they will need to register for the new CIS.

To register, a subcontractor will need to contact the Revenue by phone or over the internet and they will conduct identity checks. The rules for subcontractors to be paid gross are broadly equivalent to the current rules. There will be a business test, a turnover test and a compliance test similar to the existing regime.

Subcontractors not registered with the Revenue will suffer the higher rate deduction from any payments made to them by contractors.

« back to top


What to do now

Despite the delay until April 2007 there is clearly a lot to think about. The new system places great emphasis on contractors’ procedures and backs this up with automatic penalties. Things to think about include:

  • reviewing the self-employment status of existing subcontractors
  • reviewing computer systems/payroll systems to ensure that the monthly ‘payslip’ can be generated in the required format
  • ensuring that advice and training is undertaken to ensure a good understanding of the self-employment tests
  • ensuring that systems are put in place to cope with the verification process, payment process and monthly return process.

We are here to help you. Please talk to us to discuss the practicalities of implementing the systems that will be required to avoid the automatic penalties under the new regime.

« back to top


Disclaimer - for information of users

Disclaimer - for information of users: This bulletin is published for the information of clients. It provides only an overview of the regulations in force at the date of publication, and no action should be taken without consulting the detailed legislation or seeking professional advice. Therefore no responsibility for loss occasioned by any person acting or refraining from action as a result of the material contained in this bulletin can be accepted by the authors or the firm.

   
   
 

Employers' Compliance Update

Introduction

Over 90 per cent of UK companies are small, private and owner-managed. With this in mind, the Government is continuing with its plans to change the emphasis of company law so as to ‘think small first’, with the publishing of the Company Law Reform Bill (the Bill). In this bulletin we consider how the proposed changes may affect you and your company.

« back to top


The reform process so far

The review of company law began as far back as 1998, with an independent review. White Papers followed in 2002 and 2005. The Bill, published in November 2005, represents the latest stage.

The overall objectives

The Government’s overall objectives are to simplify and modernise company law so that it better meets today’s business needs and provides flexibility for the future. While the reform process aims to ‘think small first’, the proposals will have an impact on directors, auditors and shareholders of private, public and quoted companies.

The main objectives are to:

  • enhance shareholder engagement and a long-term investment culture
  • ensure better regulation and a ‘think small first’ approach
  • make it easier to set up and run a company
  • provide flexibility for the future.

« back to top


The proposed changes

Auditors and accounts

There has already been some progress in this area. You may remember that in January 2004 the definition criteria for small and medium-sized companies and the audit exemption limit were raised significantly, meaning that many more companies could benefit from the exemptions available.

Proposals in the 2005 Bill include:

  • Reducing the time allowed to file accounts at Companies House
Current filing deadline
Proposed filing deadline
months from the end of the accounting period
months from the end of the accounting period
Private limited company (Ltd)
10
9
Public limited company (Plc)
7
6

Comment
The potential impact of this change has been somewhat lessened, as earlier proposals intended to decrease the filing deadline for private limited companies to 7 months. It is worth remembering that there are automatic penalties if your company’s accounts are filed late. These range from £100 to £1,000 for private companies and from £500 to £5,000 for public companies, dependant upon how late the accounts are filed.
  • Plans to continue to improve audit quality

Amongst the proposals in this area is the introduction of a new criminal offence for an auditor to knowingly or recklessly include anything that is materially misleading, false or deceptive in an audit report.

Auditors will also be able to agree, subject to annual shareholder approval, contractual liability limits in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or trust occurring in the course of an audit.

  • Retaining the option to file abbreviated accounts at Companies House

Small and medium-sized companies will continue to be able to file abbreviated accounts.

Comment
Earlier proposals intended to abolish the option for small and medium-sized companies to file abbreviated accounts at Companies House. Those that currently choose to file abbreviated accounts will no doubt welcome this unexpected option.

« back to top


Directors

  • Director’s duties

In order to help make it easier to understand the general duties that a director owes to their company, there are proposals to introduce a formal, statutory statement of directors’ general duties to the company. This will largely replace the existing duties that have developed over the years through case law. The statement will include a duty to act in a way in which a director considers, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole.

There will also be more guidance available for new directors on what these duties mean.

Comment
This is essentially good news, as having director’s duties laid down in one place, rather than in a somewhat bewildering array of case law, should make it easier for all directors to both locate and understand them.
  • Transactions with directors

The current rules that regulate transactions between directors and their company, which require shareholder approval, will also be reformed and restated. In particular, the Bill permits companies, with shareholder consent, to make loans, give guarantees or provide security in connection with a loan to a director.

Comment
This reverses the existing prohibition on such transactions.

There are also proposals to:
  • enable directors to provide a service address for the public records at Companies House, rather than their private home address. Home addresses can be kept on a separate record, access to which will be restricted
  • continue to allow companies to have corporate directors, although at least one director will have to be a natural person.
Comment
Proposals here will allow a single person to form both private and public companies.

« back to top


Decision making

Here the intention is to modernise and simplify the ways in which companies take decisions. There are proposals to:

  • simplify the rules on written resolutions to make it easier for private companies to take decisions in this way, rather than by holding a formal general meeting. All resolutions of private companies will be capable of being passed in writing, with the exception of those to remove a director or an auditor
  • allow written resolutions to be carried with a majority of:
    • over 50 per cent (for ordinary resolutions)
    • 75 per cent (for special resolutions)
      of eligible votes, rather than requiring unanimity as at present
  • make greater use of electronic options for communicating with shareholders
  • allow shareholders in a private company to hold a general meeting at short notice with a 90 per cent majority, rather than the 95 per cent currently required
  • remove the requirement for private companies to hold an Annual General Meeting (AGM) unless the shareholders positively opt to do so. Public companies will continue to be required to hold an AGM. This must be within six months of the financial year end.
Comment
These proposals more accurately reflect the way in which private companies conduct their business in practice and are generally welcomed as useful changes. They should prevent unnecessary meetings from being held and therefore the decision making process should eventually become easier and quicker.

« back to top


Other areas

  • Forming a company

Amongst the proposals aimed at streamlining the formation and administration of companies, there is a proposal for new companies to adopt a single document company constitution, consisting of the articles of association. This will be simpler and clearer for both private and public companies and will replace the existing ‘Table A’. Separate model articles of association will be available for private companies, which will contain the minimum key rules on the internal workings of the company.

  • The company secretary

The requirement for a private company to have a company secretary will be abolished, although it may continue to appoint one if it wishes.

Comment
While the office of company secretary will not be mandatory, the responsibilities previously carried out by the secretary will continue to exist.
  • Other simplifications

The existing rules regarding capital maintenance and share capital provisions are complex and the Bill proposes to simplify these by removing unnecessary and burdensome requirements for private companies. In addition, under the Bill, private companies will not be prohibited from giving financial assistance for the purchase of their own shares, provided they are not subsidiaries of public companies.

The requirement to have an authorised share capital will be removed for both public and private companies.

« back to top


Going forward

In order to keep company law up to date and to ensure that it meets all of our needs, there are proposals to put those elements which are likely to need regular amendment into secondary legislation. This means that Statutory Instruments, rather than full Acts can be used in the future to amend these elements of company law.

Conclusion
The Bill is not expected to come into force before April 2007 and may go through a number of amendments during the Parliamentary process. Generally, the Bill is to be welcomed, as it is aimed at simplifying the law and reducing the regulatory burden on small businesses. However, once the Bill becomes an Act it will need to be read together with the existing 1985 Companies Act. More comprehensive simplification may have to wait until we have a single consolidated Companies Act.

If you would like to discuss the proposed changes to company law in more detail please contact us.

« back to top


Disclaimer - for information of users

This bulletin is published for the information of clients. It provides only an overview of the regulations in force at the date of publication, and no action should be taken without consulting the detailed legislation or seeking professional advice. Therefore no responsibility for loss occasioned by any person acting or refraining from action as a result of the material contained in this bulletin can be accepted by the authors or the firm.

   
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Sitemap | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Regulatory Notice
Copyright ® 2007 Heathcote & Coleman LLP | Powered By:   Heathcote-coleman UK: RSS FEED